April 26, 2022
Could Class 4 power systems replace Power over Ethernet (PoE), or more ambitiously, all electrical wiring systems? They enable the distribution of DC power at higher-voltages, and are safer than traditional AC electrical wiring.
You may be aware that there are currently four different categories that a power system or circuit can fall into in the National Electrical Code (NEC).
But a new class (Class 4) has been proposed for the next version of the National Electrical Code (NEC), which is to be released in 2023. This new class rating will be assigned to circuits that can constantly monitor for faults, and shut power off almost instantaneously if any occur. In this way, Class 4 power systems have virtually zero risk for electrical shock or fire!
In this article we'll break down further differences between the proposed Class 4 circuits, the rest of the ratings for power systems, and what makes Class 4 so revolutionary.
Most of the electrical loads in your building are inherently dangerous to wire because they have no intelligent way to actively prevent the risk of electrical shock or fire. This, in itself, is a little concerning seeing as electricity (especially AC power) can be dangerous, especially since us adults are unsupervised almost all the time, and very few of us understand how the electrical systems in our homes and buildings work.
Electrical systems in our buildings typically fall under a section in the Canadian Electrical Code (CEC) called “Wiring Methods'' (Section 12 of the CEC and OESC). The CEC states that the provisions in this section of the code book "apply to all wiring installations operating at 750 Volts or less, as well as to installations operating at voltages in excess of 750 Volts, except as modified by the requirements of Section 36". As you can imagine, this definition covers many circuits, and systems that fall under regulations relating to Wiring Methods also require a breaker panel or fuse box. Here's a screenshot from the codebook for your reference:
The rest of the circuits found in a building do not require a breaker panel because they have built-in power limitations, which act as rudimentary intelligence systems to prevent faults or safety risks to the user. These circuits are currently classified by the electrical codes in their respective countries, and a user or inspector can find out the class of a circuit by locating its power supply. In America, these circuits are classified as either Class 1, Class 2 or Class 3 by the National Electrical Code (NEC). The Canadian Electrical Code (CEC) (in Canada, of course) only classifies these circuits as either Class 1 or Class 2. Both the CEC and the NEC are reviewed and revised once every three years; the newest edition of the NEC will come out in 2023, and the next CEC will come out in 2024. What are these codes used for? Well, if you were an electrician in America, for example, and wanted to look up the proper installation, insulation, and grounding requirements and regulations for a circuit classified as either Class 1, 2 or 3, you would look in Article 725 of the NEC.
It's been released that, in the next iteration of the NEC, a new Class rating will be introduced: the Class 4 power system. This system has the capacity to deliver more power than its predecessors because of its intelligent fault management capabilities, and it has also already been publicly referred to by a few other names including Packet Energy Transfer (PET), Pulsed Power, Smart Transfer Systems, Digital Current™ (Argentum's term for it), and Fault Managed Power (FMP).
As we learn about how to supply electricity to our building systems and devices efficiently, it’s good to know what electrical loads are more risky to work with, and what power limitations exist on the circuits we’re using, or if there are any limitations at all. After all, we use electricity every day, so it’s good to know what types of circuits exist in our buildings and homes.
Additionally, technologies are becoming increasingly intelligent and plug-and-play, so learning about some basic electrical terminology will help you understand how electrical systems in your building work and how they’re evolving. For example, when we connect new light fixtures, they have always needed to be hard-wired in. But now, with the invention of Weight Supporting Ceiling Receptacles (WSCR), fixtures can be connected with a WSCR and an attachment fitting (like in the image below). This transforms installation methods that have been somewhat dangerous in the past, into easy plug-and-play experiences.
Knowing about technologies like this could help save time and money by making electrical projects easier, safer, and more future proof.
Essentially, circuits that require traditional wiring methods can provide more power to loads, but are more dangerous to work with than circuits with class ratings because they don't have built-in power limitations. Additionally, they require a breaker panel or fuse box. On the other hand, circuits that would be classified as either Class 1, 2, or 3 in the NEC have built-in power limiters and don't require a fuse box or breaker panel. This makes them safer to work with, but also means that they don’t provide sufficient power to many electrical loads, making them mainly useful in low-voltage or low-power situations.
The technology involved in electrical systems hasn’t evolved much since Nikola Tesla won the war of the currents back in the late 1800s. So what if we told you there’s a new technology that can replace many circuits that use traditional wiring methods? ISE magazine provides a simple explanation of what defines a Class 4 power system: "Simply put, where traditional powering relied on lower voltage and power limits for safety, newer systems can rely on intelligent power sources to control the safety of otherwise hazardous voltages and currents." The intelligence involved in these systems is considered "digital" because an onboard computer monitors the power cables 1000s of times a second for defined safety parameters, halting power flow if any type of fault is detected. Digital monitoring technologies are already being used to provide safety in things like:
And more, according to ISE magazine.
This is an exciting advancement in electrical technology not only for electricians or electrical engineers, but for building designers, and technology enthusiasts as well. According to the National Fire Protection Association, Class 4 (CL4) systems are characterized by monitoring a circuit for faults and controlling the power transmitted to ensure the energy and power delivered into any fault is limited, but there’s much more to them than that.
CL4 power systems have many benefits in contrast to past circuits with built-in fault management, including that they use less copper or wiring, have higher voltage limits, and are inherently intelligent. Their disadvantage is mainly that their power sourcing equipment is significantly more complex. This disadvantage means that in many scenarios, it's overkill to use a CL4 circuit. Despite this disadvantage, the advantages have led to the proposal of using Class 4 systems in place of traditional wiring in certain cases. This is a big deal since no other class rated circuits have been able to safety fulfill the voltage requirements of circuits that fall under the category of "wiring methods" in the NEC. If CL4 power systems can replace traditional wiring (which traditionally distributes AC power), a huge benefit to this will be that it will enable the proliferation of DC power distribution throughout the building industry. In turn, this will bring more buildings close to operating at net-zero. In support of this, Smart Buildings Technology mentions that, according to Luis Suau, chief business officer with Sinclair Digital, LLC, "it’s now more about the improved efficiency, sustainability, and safety achieved by replacing AC power with DC power throughout the building". Additionally, Sinclair points out that after switching to DC power distribution throughout their building (thanks to Power over Ethernet and other DC power distribution systems), Sinclair Hotel uses 39% less power.
Before we dive deeper into Class 4 power systems, it’s essential that we break down the primary differences between Class 1, 2, and 3 circuits in the NEC. We’ll also cover any differences between circuit classifications in the NEC and the CEC. Understanding these class ratings better will help to clarify how Class 4 circuits differ from them. These differences are often dependent on various situations, so this guide is no replacement for the code books in your own country, but we hope these tables will help you understand general differences between classes, when certain class ratings would be applied, and what the purpose of this whole electrical rating system is.
This table differentiates between circuits rated by the NEC as either Class 1, 2, or 3. Many of these same rules apply to the CEC as well, and if you want to see some of the specific primary differences between the NEC and the CEC, you can jump to Table 2.
So far we've defined the primary differences between the established class ratings, and reviewed what the major differences are between rating systems in Canada and America. The purpose of this next section will be to go over the main differences between these established class ratings, and the proposed Class 4 rating. Note that, for the purpose of this section, we’ll compare Class 4 power systems to the class rating system present in the NEC (America's electrical code), and won't be covering specific differences between the NEC and the Canadian Electrical Code (CEC).
Keep in mind that this table assumes that the power source is inherently limited (so overcurrent protection such as breaker panels and fuse boxes are not required).
Additional comments on voltages and implications of data in the table.
See the table below for more information from the NEC about Class 2 and Class 3 DC powered circuits:
A Class 4 power system is a type of Fault Managed Power System (FMPS), and FMPSs are divided into 2 broad categories:
In point-to-point configurations, Class 4 power systems often consist of a Class 4 power transmitter and a Class 4 power receiver connected by a cabling system. On the other hand, the established class rated circuits (circuits rated Class 1 - 3) are defined by the NEC as circuits that constitute the portion of the wiring system between the load side of the overcurrent protection device (OCPD) or the power-limited supply and all connected equipment.
Here are a couple definitions that will help you understand how a Class 4 circuit is built to connect a power transmitter and receiver in a point-to-point configuration:
Power Transmitter: In the Argentum Class 4 power system, for example, a power transmitter receives power from a AC power supply, converts it to DC power, and has intelligence built in to monitor for things such as fault conditions (often with a microcontroller).
Power Receiver: In general terms, the definition for a receiver involved in electrical devices is a device that "accepts signals, such as radio waves, and converts them (frequently with amplification) into useful forms. Examples are telephone receivers, which transform electrical impulses into audio signals, and radio or television receivers, which accept electromagnetic waves and convert them into sound or television pictures".
In the Argentum Class 4 power system, specifically, a receiver is a device that connects to the Class 4 transmitter to provide confirmation that a safe physical connection has been established. Then the receiver communicates with the transmitter to let it know that it's now safe to send power. The receiver can also have the ability to convert from Class 4 to Class 2 power at its output (which essentially means that it can lower voltage levels). In this way the receiver in Class 4 power systems acts as an interface between a Class 4 power system and a Class 2 power system.
Circuits given a class rating of Class 1, 2, or 3 have mainly one thing in common: they all have power limiters. Class 1 power limited circuits, for example, use a built-in overcurrent protection device (OCPD) to limit current flow. According to Safeopedia, the most common OCPDs are fuses, circuit breakers, and overcurrent relays. Class 4 circuits, on the other hand, are characterized by incorporated, intelligent technology that does two things:
Essentially Class 4 power systems monitor energized circuits for faults, and control the power transmitted to ensure that, if there’s a fault, a very limited amount of power or energy is delivered to it.
Additionally, Class 4 systems differ from Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 systems because Class 1, 2, and 3 systems have a defined power limit based on their cable or connected load. On the other hand, Class 4 systems are limited with respect to risk of shock and fire between the Class 4 transmitter and Class 4 receiver. This allows them to deliver much higher levels of power and voltage to loads, even without a breaker, fuse box, ground wire, or significant insulation. There is, however, still a power limitation on Class 4 circuits; they are supplied by a power source (transmitter) that has a peak voltage output of not more than 450 Volts DC line to line or 225 Volts DC line to ground.
Aside from this power limitation, the transmitter used in Class 4 power systems only limits current flow based on predetermined fault conditions. The transmitter gathers and decodes information about a circuit in real-time, and interrupts its power flow when any of these fault conditions occur:
Because Class 4 systems interrupt power flow so quickly (currently set at under 5 seconds) when a fault occurs, they have the equivalent level of protection from electric shock as Class 2 circuits.
The safety precautions that exist in circuits rated Class 1 - 3 have two things in common: they all have built-in overcurrent protection devices (OCPDs), and their safety requirements are very layered and complex. If you want to know about the power limitations that OCPD devices apply in each case, you can see them in the table above. Aside from this, the safety requirements applied to each class rating differs with respect to other factors. These factors may include, but are not limited to:
For example, Class 1 circuits require 2 levels of protection: insulation of the conductor (such as a copper wire) and a means of connection to the Earth's protective conductor (Earth wire). On the other hand, Class 2 circuits require at least 2 layers of insulation: basic insulation and a plastic case on devices. Additionally, Class 2 circuits are considered safe from a fire initiation standpoint and provide acceptable protection from electric shock, whereas Class 3 circuits are only considered safe from a fire initiation standpoint, not from electrical shock.
The safety requirements for Class 4 systems are quite different (based on what we know so far from the proposal). For one thing, Class 4 power systems do not involve a built-in overcurrent protection device (OCPD). Instead, they monitor for faults in real-time, and shut off power when a fault occurs.
As you can see, there are many benefits to Class 4 power systems. However, these are the main takeaways:
For now, Class 4 systems are in the final proposal stage, and we will know more about them in 2023 when the new edition of the National Electrical Code (NEC) is published. In the meantime, you can see that Class 4 power systems are exciting, not only for electrical engineers and electricians, but also for building managers looking to implement safer, lighter power systems. Power over Ethernet (rated as Class 2) used to be the new and exciting technology, but it has its limitations, and Class 4 power systems can provide the same benefits as PoE, but with the capacity to provide higher voltages (up to 450 Volts) than PoE systems. We know that, even though PoE has its limitations, the market for it continues to grow due to its many advantages. In fact, PoE is anticipated to grow from $113.8 million in 2021 to $614.9 million by the end of 2030. If this is the case, imagine how popular Class 4 power systems will be once they proliferate the market (seeing as they can distribute higher voltage levels than PoE with the same benefits).
Eventually, Class 4 power systems can even replace the need for some circuits that fall under Wiring Methods in the Canadian Electrical Code (CEC), which will make working with electrical systems in our buildings safer, and sometimes maybe even replace the need to hire an electrician. In buildings where Class 4 circuits replace traditional Wiring Methods, breaker panels and fuse boxes won't be necessary, so it would be interesting to see the implications of this in action.
If you have any further questions about Class 4 power systems, and the benefits of this newly proposed technology, send us a message! Argentum already provides an intelligent Class 4 power system, and we would be happy to chat with you about how this innovation in electrical power could benefit your building. Contact us through our website.
Could Class 4 power systems replace Power over Ethernet (PoE)? They enable the distribution of DC power at higher-voltages, and are safer than typical electrical systems.read more
Learn why Tesla's invention was chosen over Edison's.read more